BLOG
A Loss in the Fund Crisis Is Not a Single Legal Event
The loss suffered in the fund crisis is not a single legal event. The fall in the value of fund units, the failure to execute a sale order, the non-payment of the proceeds of an executed sale, the non-return of custodied assets and the incorrect construction of the liquidation account are separate doors; behind each door waits a different counterparty, a different time limit and a different document.
The first step in seeking your rights is knowing which door you are standing in front of. There is a multi-layered map of remedies ranging from administrative applications to the Capital Markets Board and damages actions to Investor Compensation Centre procedures and criminal complaints; each has a different counterparty, time limit and burden of proof.
My book Legal Remedies for Investors Harmed by the Fund Crisis, in which I try to open these doors one by one and explain what can be claimed at each, from whom and until when, will be published very shortly by Seçkin Yayıncılık. I hope it proves useful.
- The Report Lost in the Archive, the Penalty Imposed on the Taxpayer
- The Chamber of Commerce Has an Accountants’ Committee; Why Is There No Lawyers’ Committee?
- The Provision in Article 359 of the Tax Procedure Law Is Not “Effective Remorse”
- Payment-Based Reduction in Tax Evasion and the Problem of the Remaining 50 Percent
- The Truth Behind the Haggling for Cash; the Card Commission
- What “No Amnesty, Only Instalments” Means on the Ground
- What Does “Twice as Much Again” Mean in Real Estate Tax? Provisional Article 23
- The 90 Percent Value Increase Share in Zoning Plan Amendments; Incentive or Lock?
- KURGAN and Real-Time Audit; a Paradigm Shift in Tax Audits
- Even If You Win the Tax Case, the Tax Office Looks at the “Directive”